Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Laing v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. 86-202Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partUrbigkit, Justice

I agree with the court that an illegal sentence was imposed, and disagree that the abject failure of adequate representation effectively portrayed in factual analysis in this case meets the reasonableness tests of our precedent in Frias v. State, Wyo., 722 P.2d 135 (1986), and of the United States Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, reh. denied 467 U.S. 1267, 104 S.Ct. 3562, 82 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984).1

*1251For specificity and thoughtfulness on effectiveness of counsel, one could providently look to the logic of the most approved-of justice of our…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API