Legal Opinion

Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Faust

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMalpass, J.

The defendant has made this motion for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant either as administratrix of the estate of Dorothy F. Boop, deceased, or as administratrix of the estate of Samuel Boop, deceased.

The action arises out of an automobile accident which occurred near Sangerfield in this State on August 28, 1945, in which accident a collision occurred between a bus owned by the plaintiff and an automobile owned by Dorothy F. Boop, deceased, and driven at the time by her husband, Samuel Boop, also deceased. Both…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heilbrunn v. KelloggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Heilbrunn v. KelloggNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ShaulNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. Loomis v. Delta Chevrolet, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API