Howard v. Stature Electric, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Pigott, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether claimant’s Alford* plea should be given preclusive effect in a subsequent workers’ compensation proceeding. Because it cannot be said that the guilty plea necessarily resolved the issue raised in the workers’ compensation proceeding, preclusive effect should not be given.
In March 2003, claimant, David Howard, sustained a back injury while employed by respondent Stature Electric, Inc. He applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits. At a workers’ compensation hearing, when asked, claimant testified that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Claim of Howard v. Stature Electric, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by19 opinions
- Robert Freedman v. Sumner RedstoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Matter of Sanchez v. US ConcreteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Bemis v. Town of Crown PointAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- DerOhannesian v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Rodriguez v. American Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.