Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tate

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. 92-P-691PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

When the defendant Roy L. Tate, Jr., was released from State prison on probation, 1 it was a condition of his probation that he have no contact of any kind with Joyce Harris or any member of her family. Tate had been serving concurrent sentences for, among other offenses, the aggravated rape of Harris and, on the same occasion, perpetrating upon her an assault and battery with intent to kill (he had stabbed her in the chest, puncturing one of her lungs). For violation of the “absolutely no contact” condition, a judge of the Superior Court ordered the revocation of Tate’s probation. From that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Rubera v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. FavulliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gray v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. NegronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. State v. DanaherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API