Legal Opinion · Dissent

J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Webster

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2003No. 01-0774Published

1DissentJustice Schneider

I respectfully dissent. The controversy in this case involves a company’s arbitration policy that an employee agreed to sign after beginning his employment. When the company sought to enforce the arbitration policy, the trial court denied the motion to compel arbitration. A divided court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s order. The Court says that the wording in the arbitration policy is ambiguous and that the case should be sent back to the trial court to hear evidence concerning the parties’ intent. But I would not be as hasty as the Court to send this matter back to the trial court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API