Legal Opinion

State v. Coenen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 1940No. 35676Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

Defendant in this case is charged in the bill of indictment returned by th$ Grand Jury of Richland Parish in the Fifth Judicial District Court with the violation of Section 3 of Act 123 of the Extra Session of 1921, known as the dual office holding act.

This section provides that: “Any person holding one office of profit who shall accept a second office of profit, and shall after his acceptance of the second office, exercise any of the duties or receive any of the emoluments of the first office shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall on conviction be punished by a fine not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TerziaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. State v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API