Legal Opinion

Weintraut v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided July 27, 2016No. Docket Nos. 6505-12, 6715-12, 6751-12UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS L. WEINTRAUT, TRANSFEREE, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Weintraut v. Comm'r

Docket Nos. 6505-12, 6715-12, 6751-12

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2016-142; 2016 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 141;

July 27, 2016, Filed

An appropriate order will be issued denying in part and granting in part petitioners' motion in limine, and decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

Brett J. Miller and Randal J. Kaltenmark, for petitioners.

Stewart Todd Hittinger and Samuel A. Naylor, for respondent.

CHIECHI, Judge.

CHIECHI

CONTENTS

FINDINGS OF FACT

FFI and Petitioners

FFI, Petitioners,…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Tokarski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandra K. Shockley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Billy F. Hawk, Jr., GST Non-Exempt Marital Trust v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Hawk v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API