Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kenneth R. Fisher, J.

Defendant moves pursuant to CPL 290.10 for a trial order of dismissal of the count charging robbery in the first degree, Penal Law § 160.15 (3), on the ground that the trial evidence is not legally sufficient to establish both the forcible taking element, and the use of a dangerous instrument element. The latter contention is based on the fact that the object stolen, a loaded pistol, is alleged to have been the dangerous instrument *589used during the course of the robbery. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

The Facts

Taking the evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. HernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. HandburghWashington Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API