Newtown Creek Towing Co. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The Golden Age was damaged by colliding with the city’s bridge at Newtown creek on November 25, 1924. Liability was imposed upon the appellant. In measuring and allowing damages, 12 days’ demurrage is allowed — the necessary time for repairs. Proof of such damage for detention rested upon the testimony of appellee’s bookkeeper, and in substance showed the earnings, expenses, and average profit per day over a period including' the time the tug was being repaired — November 27 to December 10, 1924. It appears that the appellee owned and operated 21 tugs, and had on hand 4 or 5 daily, as spare…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The North StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- The Winfield S. CahillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Aktieselskapet Bonheur v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- Navigazione Libera Triestina Societa Anonima v. Newtown Creek Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Ove Skou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- The GlendolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Tanker Hygrade No. 24, Inc. v. The Tug DynamicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.