Legal Opinion

Hudson & Manhattan RR Co. v. City of Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 8, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 N.J. Super. 333 (1950)

71 A.2d 220

HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 23, 1950.

Decided February 8, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

The appellants in this proceeding seek to set aside, as discriminatory and invalid, resolutions of the Board of Commissioners of Jersey City relating to tax appeals by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. City of Perth AmboyNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987
  2. Jat Company, Inc. v. Division of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Freehold Borough v. WNY Properties L.P.New Jersey Tax Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API