Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Larned State Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2015No. 14-3103UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant David Allen Thompson, Sr., proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he alleged prosecutors violated his constitutional rights by issuing a subpoena duces tecum for certain medical records.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gallagher v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Wilkerson v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Dockins v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Betchan v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Eric C. Reyes v. Brett Skidmore et al.District Court, D. Utah · 2026
  3. Lomon v. ByersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  4. Powell v. LaurieDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Viveros v. Sumner County Detention CenterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API