Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County. —Nathan L. Bachman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Laksden

Smith commenced this suit in the circuit court of Hamilton county to recover of the railway company for damages for- personal injuries alleged to have been received by him, and for damages to certain personal property, in an accident to a passenger coach of the defendant company in November, 1913. There is no question here but what the company was negligent and' the plaintiff received injuries. The only question arises upon a plea of res adjudicata filed by the railway company. The facts pertinent to this plea are as follows:

Plaintiff and his wife, in November, 1913, were traveling, on one of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whaley v. CatlettTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Love v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Railroad v. BrigmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. ClevelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Myhra v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Clancey v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Johnston v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API