Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
McManaway v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 23, 2001No. 97-280Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteinberg, Judge
I voted to grant the Secretary’s stay motion in part (as to the $3,634.88 requested for representation in the Federal Circuit) and deny it in part (as to the $7,362.65 requested for representation here). I see no reason to proceed separately with the issue of EAJA fees for work in the Federal Circuit that has been briefed for a panel of the Court in Linville, 15 Vet.App. 48.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Linville v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001