Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McManaway v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 23, 2001No. 97-280Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteinberg, Judge

I voted to grant the Secretary’s stay motion in part (as to the $3,634.88 requested for representation in the Federal Circuit) and deny it in part (as to the $7,362.65 requested for representation here). I see no reason to proceed separately with the issue of EAJA fees for work in the Federal Circuit that has been briefed for a panel of the Court in Linville, 15 Vet.App. 48.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Linville v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001