Legal Opinion

Talmage v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Smith, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered in an action of trespass. The case made by plaintiff’s proofs was substantially as follows: On the evening of September 17, 1891, some limekilns were burning a short distance from defendant’s premises, in Portland, Ionia county. Defendant had on his premises certain sheds. He came up to *372the' vicinity of the sheds, and saw six or eight hoys on the roof of one of them. He claims that he ordered the boys to get down, and they at once did so. He then passed around to where he had a view of the roof of another shed, and saw two boys on. the roof. The defendant claims that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Kirchner v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Alteiri v. ColassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Sinram v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Morrow v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Washington & O. D. Ry. Co. v. DulanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API