Legal Opinion

Isham v. Burgett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action for the price of poles sold for the use of an electric light company. The defendant contended that the company alone was liable, and asked a ruling to that effect. The judge before whom the case was tried found as a fact that the contract was made by the defendant, and the only question is whether there was any evidence warranting the finding. The testimony was, that the defendant gave a written order, and orally instructed the plaintiffs to charge the goods to the company. The order, when produced, appeared to be signed by the defendant in such a way as to charge him on its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fry's v. Lexington & Big Sandy RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Brown v. BradleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Sloan v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Lyman B. Brooks Co. v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Caldwell v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Hilliard v. You-Do-It Electronics Hobby Center, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API