Legal Opinion

People v. Doxtater

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Jefferson county. Action by the people against Milton W. Doxtater to recover a penalty for catching fish in violation of Laws 1886, c. 141. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for §50, directed by the court, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMebwih, J.

By chapter 141 of the Laws of 1886, entitled “An .act to prevent taking fish from the waters of Lake Ontario adjacent to the shore of Jefferson county, by other means than angling,” it Is provided that “no person shall at any time kill or take from the waters of Henderson bay or Lake Ontario within one mile from the ■shore between the most westerly point of Pillar Point and the boundary line between the counties of Jefferson and Oswego, or within -one mile from the shore of any island in Lake Ontario which is a part of Jefferson county, except Grenadier island and Fox island «or from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phelps v. . RaceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Gentile v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Neuendorff v. . DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Fleet v. HegehanNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Astor v. Arcade Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  2. In re the Fishway in Dam Crossing the West Branch of DelawareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. Heckman v. SwettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. DoxtaterNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. FargoNew York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API