State v. Baer
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a robbery conviction1 at a jury trial, contending that there was error in the trial court’s refusal to give a requested instruction on “mental defect or disease” as a defense.
The trial court gave instructions as to necessity of “intention” to commit an offense, to the effect that a defendant must know that the nature of his conduct may result in an offense; that voluntary intoxication is no defense to a crime; and that the use of heroin in combination with another drug, is no defense, unless at the time of the alleged offense, the accused was incapable of forming…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
- Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. WilcoxUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. ColemanUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. HendricksUtah Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1984