Spica v. International Ladies Garment Workers' Union
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
I concur'in the majority’s action in sustaining the dismissal of the complaint on the'ground that appellant failed to exhaust her • internal union remedial processes.
I dissent, however, from the majority’s alternative* holding that the instant suit is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act.
In my view, the. preemption issue in the instant case is governed by International Association of Machinists v. Gonzales, 356 U.S. 617, 78 S. Ct. 923 (1958); In that case, a union member claimed that he had béenexpelled from membership in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Local 100, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. PerkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.