Legal Opinion

Reifsnyder v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 30, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. H. C. Traverse, Judge. Action to recover for damages to a team, wagon,, and harness. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment, for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. The testimony shows that - the-ground where the accident happened is bounded on the east by Jefferson street, on the south by the Des Moines-river, and on the west by Greene street. A plat attached to the abstract shows that Greene street is on the east,, and Jefferson street on the west; but this is a mistake,, as appears from the testimony of all of the witnesses. The action is brought to recover damages to the team,, wagon, and harness of plaintiff. The following facts-are either admitted in the pleadings or established by the evidence: The accident occurred on the switch and depot…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Tobey v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Green v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API