Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Black

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1827PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In the Circuit Court of Madison county, Black declared vs. Bennett for a malicious prosecution in having a warrant issued against him, and having him arrested for the crime of robbery, in forcibly taking a negro slave from Bennett’s possession, not guiity, and issue verdict and judgement for the plaintiff. £)n the trial the plaintiff gave in evidence, a warrant for the apprehension of himself, Hugh M. Miller, and Fran-f;js yy.

Read the full summary

In the Circuit Court of Madison county, Black declared vs. Bennett for a malicious prosecution in having a warrant issued against him, and having him arrested for the crime of robbery, in forcibly taking a negro slave from Bennett’s possession, not guiity, and issue verdict and judgement for the plaintiff. £)n the trial the plaintiff gave in evidence, a warrant for the apprehension of himself, Hugh M. Miller, and Fran-f;js yy. Flanagan, “ to answer a charge of robbery, by for-' cibly taking one negro from and out of the possession of Samuel Bennett,” and the affidavit made by Bennett'as the…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE CRENSHAW

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are of opinion that the Circuit Court erred in rejecting the testimony as set forth in the first assignment. We think that the instructions given to the jury, were in other respects correct. Judgement reversed, and cause, remanded.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ewing v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  2. Crosby v. HawthornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Burlingame v. BurlingameNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Chandler v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API