Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Rice

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of contract against the sureties on a bond, dated September 15, 1925, given to dissolve an attachment. The plaintiff is the obligee and the defendants are the two sureties. The only excepting party is the defendant Abraham Werby, who will be referred to as the defendant.

At the hearing of the case by a judge without a jury, he found for the plaintiff in the penal sum of the bond and ordered execution in a stated sum. In referring to the defences set up in the answer the judge in his finding of facts stated that he was not satisfied that the plaintiff or her attorney made the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Hudson v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Province Securities Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Giatas v. DemoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API