Legal Opinion

Bolds v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 11, 1968No. 52820PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

Acting pro se plaintiff, a state prisoner, sought original habeas corpus relief, and in like manner appeals from adverse judgment by trial court.

By virtue of the factual situation peculiar to the case at bar, we reverse.

Trial court granted plaintiff an eviden-tiary hearing without benefit of counsel. Then when appeal was taken his request for assistance of an attorney was denied, but what is designated as a transcript of proceedings on the habeas hearing was provided and is now before us. However, it does not include a copy of the pleadings filed, and is at best so sketchy…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Partain v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GilroySupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. State v. RichterNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brewer v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Official Committee of Disputed Litigation Creditors v. McDonald Investment, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API