Legal Opinion

Neacy v. Thomas

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: F. 0. Esci-iwexlee, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 5, 1911:

Winslow, C. J.

In an action of libel the defendant Berger declined to answer a large number of questions which were asked him in the course of his examination as an ad*92verse witness under see. 4096, Stats. (Laws of 1909, ch. 84), on the ground that he believed that his answers might tend to incriminate him. The commissioner certified the matter to the circuit court, where‘an order was entered requiring the witness to answer certain of the questions, and sustaining his claim of privilege as to a large number of the questions. The plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Phipps v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karel v. ConlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kennelly v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API