Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Skupa
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Saline county. Tried below before Pound, J., sitting for Morris, J. cited: jB. & M. v. Lent, il Neb., 201. Phelps v. JR. B., 63 111., .468. Iowa v. Michel, '41 Iowa, 402. Uhl v. Pence, 11 Neb., 316. cited: Dahin v. Allen, 8 Cush., 33. Myers v. Koenig, 5 Neb., 419. Leach v. Sutphen, 11 Id., 527. Streeter v. Bolph, 13 Id., 388.
1Opinion of the CourtBeese, J.
This action was instituted before a justice of the peace for the possession of certain real estate under the provisions of chapter ten of the civil code, entitled “ Actions for the forcible entry and detention, or forcible detention only, of property.” On the trial before the justice of the peace the following facts were agreed to as a part of thé evidence in the case:
“It is agreed by the defendant that the land in controversy was duly patented by the United States to the Burlington and Missouri Biver Bailroad Company in Nebraska, *342and that the Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nightingale v. BarensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Monroe County v. TellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Uhl v. PenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lipp v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Smith v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Hill v. SidieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Bledsoe v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Brennan v. ShanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.