Legal Opinion

Camarillo v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1980No. 3-680A162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Frank Camarillo was convicted of attempted robbery and sentenced to two years imprisonment. On appeal the defendant raises a single issue charging that the court erred in not permitting the defendant’s expert medical witness to continue his testimony regarding the defendant’s sanity and thereby violated the defendant’s right to a fair trial.

The events giving rise to this charge began with the defendant’s plea of not responsible by reason of insanity. The court appointed two psychiatrists to examine the defendant and determine his sanity at the time of the alleged crime. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Sowders v. MurrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Borst v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Gould v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Borst v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Heald v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API