Legal Opinion

C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury Fund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 10, 1983No. [No. 30, September Term, 1983.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari having been granted, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirming the judgment of the Baltimore City Court in C & P Telephone Company of Maryland v. Subsequent Injury Fund, 53 Md. App. 508, 453 A.2d 1243 (1983) is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Adkins.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.

Costs to be paid by the petitioner.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. C & P Telephone Co. v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Subsequent Injury Fund v. TeneyckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. KrausCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. McKenzie v. C.C. Kottcamp & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API