Legal Opinion

Black v. Clasby

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1893No. 18066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. The facts are stated, in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendant Clasby was the constable of the first judicial township in the county of Colusa, and as such officer seized and took into his possession, under a writ of attachment issued out of the justice’s court for that township, in the action of W. W. Ludy v. Henry B. Black, certain personal property belonging to the plaintiff. At the time of its seizure, a portion of the property was in the possession of the plaintiff, and another portion in the possession of one Spencer, who was holding it as bailee for the plaintiff; but none of it was in possession of the defendant in the writ. A few…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boulware v. CraddockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. George H. Fuller Desk Co. v. McDadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fulton v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Montgomery v. KirkseyArizona Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API