Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Warren

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 10, 1969No. 5-4826PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Fred H. Warren under the uninsured motorists clause of a policy issued to him by Hartford. The principal point urged by appellant for reversal is its contention that a judgment against the uninsured motorist was a condition precedent to this action.

The policy in question contained clauses identical with those in the policy involved in MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. Bradshaw, 245 Ark. 95, 431 S.W. 2d 252. In that case we held that when consent of the company to an action against the uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Glen R. Vaught v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Home Insurance v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API