Legal Opinion

Vendetto v. Sonat Offshore Drilling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1997No. 96 CA 0626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IzGONZALES, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a suit for damages under the Jones Act and general maritime law.

FACTS

Plaintiff Joseph Vendetto, was employed as a seaman aboard the M/V DISCOVERER 534, which was owned and operated by defendant, Sonat Offshore Drilling Co. (Sonat). On or about January 19, 1993, Mr. Vendetto was assisting with a routine maintenance procedure on an engine in a thruster aboard the DISCOVERER 534 when he suffered a neck injury.

On January 10, 1994, Mr. Vendetto filed the instant suit for damages against Sonat, setting forth two theories of recovery, namely Jones Act…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Segura v. FrankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Barry Brister and Karen Brister, Cross-Appellees v. A.W.I., Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Whitney Allen v. Seacoast Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vendetto v. Sonat Offshore Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API