Legal Opinion

Midfirst Bank v. Cote

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 29, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, J. ■

[¶ 1] Mary T. and Ricky J.R. Cote appeal from a decision of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) granting Mid-first Bank’s motion for relief from a judgment of foreclosure and denying the Cotes’ motion to enforce redemption. The Cotes contend that the appeal is reviewable under the judicial economy, death knell, and extraordinary circumstances exceptions to the final judgment rule; that the court exceeded its authority in granting the Rule 60(b)(1) motion; and that their right of redemption should be enforced. We agree with the bank that the appeal is interlocutory and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Morse Bros., Inc. v. WebsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Department of Human Services v. LowatchieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. First National Bank of Boston v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API