Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Orange v. Sokolski

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Orange County; W. B. Powell, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Orange against R. Sokolski and others. From so much of a judgment as denied plaintiff’s right to enforce execution against defendants” alleged homestead, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

The First National Bank of Orange instituted this action against Mrs. R. Sokolski, widow, to recover the amount due upon certain promissory notes for over $300, and at the same time sued out an attachment which it caused to be levied upon a certain house and lot in the town of Orange. Mrs. Sokolski resisted the attempt to-foreclose the attachment on the ground that the property levied upon constituted her homestead. Before the trial A. W. Dycus, trustee in bankruptcy of the defendant, intervened, and claimed the property as part of the estate of the said bankrupt. Upon trial, with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roco v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Cross v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. American National Bank v. CrugerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Wolfe v. BuckleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. First National Bank of Orange v. SokolskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tunnell v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Chesnut v. SpechtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API