Jaro v. Holstein
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Ernest Moore, special Judge, Abbeville, Noverrn ber, 1904. Action by Martin G. Jaro against J. C. Holstein. From' judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: The liquors were exempt from seizure until they arrived at destination: 67 S, C., 402; 55 S. G, 238; 196 U. S., 133. Even if intended for an unlawful use: Pabst Brewing Co: v. Crenshaw, 25 Sup.- Ct. R.; American Express Co: v. Iowa, 25 Sup. Ct.
Read the full summary
Before Ernest Moore, special Judge, Abbeville, Noverrn ber, 1904. Action by Martin G. Jaro against J. C. Holstein. From' judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cites: The liquors were exempt from seizure until they arrived at destination: 67 S, C., 402; 55 S. G, 238; 196 U. S., 133. Even if intended for an unlawful use: Pabst Brewing Co: v. Crenshaw, 25 Sup.- Ct. R.; American Express Co: v. Iowa, 25 Sup. Ct. R.; 70 S. C., 61. State wets real party: 68 S. C., 419. cites: Allegation as to information of illegal use properly stricken out: Grim. Code, 594; 21 Ency., 228. ■ State not necessary…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
In this action of claim and delivery the plaintiff recovered judgment for the possession of two mules and a wagon, and thirty-five dollars damages. The appeal relates mainly to the following defense set up- in the defendant’s answer: “That he is a State constable, whose duty it is to look after the enforcement of the dispensary law of this State. That having information that the defendant was violating the dispensary law1 of the State by hauling and handling contraband liquor both in the day and night time, this defendant was on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PopeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. v. GosnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- State v. MesservySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910