Legal Opinion

In Re Barrett

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 25, 2008No. 26537Published

1Per curiam

By way of the attached order of the Indiana Supreme Court, respondent was publicly reprimanded.

The Clerk of this Court sent a letter via certified mail to respondent notifying him that, pursuant to Rule 29(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, he had thirty (30) days in which to inform the Court of any claim he might have that a public reprimand in this state is not warranted and the reasons for any such claim. No response was received. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a response stating it has no information that would indicate the imposition of identical discipline in this state is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re StratosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. In Re BrookerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re ScreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API