Legal Opinion
Secretary of the Army v. Tecom, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 19, 2009No. 2008-1171PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) granting summary judgment in favor of Tecom, Inc., and holding that defense costs and settlement payments associated with a Title VII sexual harassment suit are allowable costs under the Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”). Tecom Inc., ASBCA No. 53884, 54461, 2007 WL 2899660 (Sept. 21, 2007) (“Board Decision”). We hold that under the contract the costs associated with an adverse judgment would not be allowable, and that under our decision in Boeing North American, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boeing North American, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Dewey Electronics Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Lear Siegler Services v. Rumsfeld, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Vintage Autoworks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Bechtel National, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Bechtel National, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.