Legal Opinion
Lee v. Chun Ka Luk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 23, 2015No. 14927N 603111/05PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered September 15, 2014, which denied defendant’s motion for leave to amend the answer to assert the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
As Supreme Court had previously denied defendant’s preanswer motion to dismiss the complaint on statute of limitations grounds, holding that the causes of action were timely, the court correctly found that the law of the case precluded defendant from seeking leave to amend his answer to reassert the same defense (see Carmona v Mathisson, 92 AD3d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carmona v. MathissonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cherebin v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sabo v. Alan B. Brill, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Briggs v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- White v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Park Union Condominium v. 910 Union St., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Park Union Condominium v. 910 Union St., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Lee v. Chun Ka LukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026