Ettlinger v. Trew
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.
It appears that an action was started by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendant from maintaining and operating a telephone service and from soliciting professional men and women for such service in Richmond Hill, Woodhaven, Ozone Park, Kew Gardens and Forest Hills. An injunction pendente lite was issued *745on October 14, 1940. Subsequently, a motion was made to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This motion was granted with leave to plaintiff to plead over and an order thereon dismissing the complaint was entered on November…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Goldman v. CornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Blakeslee v. International Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914