Legal Opinion

Ettlinger v. Trew

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

It appears that an action was started by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendant from maintaining and operating a telephone service and from soliciting professional men and women for such service in Richmond Hill, Woodhaven, Ozone Park, Kew Gardens and Forest Hills. An injunction pendente lite was issued *745on October 14, 1940. Subsequently, a motion was made to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This motion was granted with leave to plaintiff to plead over and an order thereon dismissing the complaint was entered on November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Goldman v. CornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Blakeslee v. International Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API