McGary v. State

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction was for violating the law prohibiting the pursuit of selling intoxicating liquors in territory where¡ its sale was prohibited. There was evidence sufficient to justify the finding that appellant sold a quart of whisky to two of the parties named in the indictment, about the time therein charged. The other evidence as to the pursuit of the occupation or business of selling intoxicating liqiior was quite meager.

There were circumstances showing that another party got a bottle of whisky from appellant’s house about the same time, though the evidence leaves it…