Meyer Bros. Drug Co. v. Fly
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the circuit court of Pike county. Hon. D. M. Miller, Judge. Suit by Meyer Bros. Drug Company against Anthony Fly. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. Under section 2157, Code of 1906, abandonment having", been made of the lot without casualty or necessity, the same became liable to indebtedness.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the circuit court of Pike county. Hon. D. M. Miller, Judge. Suit by Meyer Bros. Drug Company against Anthony Fly. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. Under section 2157, Code of 1906, abandonment having", been made of the lot without casualty or necessity, the same became liable to indebtedness. Section 2157 of tbe Cod o.-, Bennett v. Dempsey, 94 Miss. 406; Thompson v. Tillotson, 56 Miss. 36; Shotwell v. Covington, 69 Miss 335; Wetherbee v. Boots, 72 Miss. 355; Bank v. Lyon, 52 Miss. 183; Majors v. Majors, 58…
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
Anthony Fly was a resident for some years of McComb City, and was engaged in the drug business there. He purchased a house and lot in that city, which he, with his family, consisting of his wife and several children, oc: cupied as a home. During the latter part of 1909 and the first of 1910 he assisted in organizing a drug business in the city of New Orleans, which was located on Canal street and known as “A. Fly, The Druggist.” The business was incorporated. He was one of the incorporators and stockholders. ' He was also the general manager. The business continued during the year of 1910,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hairston v. HairstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. OhleSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Trotter v. DobbsMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
- Irwin v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barnes & Co. v. BuchananMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
- Bank of Hattiesburg v. MollereMississippi Supreme Court · 1918