Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trice v. Bridgewater

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1932No. 1220Published

1DissentAlexander, J.

For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, I concur in the holding that the judgment of the trial court cannot be affirmed. However, I am of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed and rendered in favor of C. L. Trice.

On the occasion in question, Wilson Trice, the minor son of C. L. Trice, used his father’s automobile to take two young ladies and a young man, friends of his, for a ride. After being joined by his friends, he allowed one of them to drive the car, and while it was being so driven the collision occurred. C. L. Trice’s supposed liability is based solely on the fact…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Lewis v. AmorousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API