Legal Opinion
Klemm v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 16, 2008No. 06-16981PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Appellee Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denied Appellant Thomas Klemm’s motion to reopen an application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. Klemm subsequently filed a complaint with the District Court, which the District Court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confront two jurisdictional questions: whether Klemm’s appeal was timely and whether the District Court erred by concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Royall v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIOCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Walton v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Demaree v. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.