Harrington v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Angstman
I agree with what is said in the majority opinion with respect to the subject of the liability of defendant company. I also agree with what is said therein to the effect that whether defendant Thompson is liable is a question for the jury. I do not agree with the conclusion that the case should be remanded for a new trial as to defendant Thompson. As to him I think the judgment should be affirmed.
I concede that at common law the rule was that where a verdict had been rendered against two joint tort-feasors it would not be set aside as against one and permitted to stand as to the other. (20 E.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.