Legal Opinion

Potts v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1975No. 50431PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

"The books are literally full of such cases.” That frequently used expression refers to the many adjudications dealing with real estate sales contracts drafted by laymen containing contingency clauses as to financing arrangements. In this appeal we are called upon to decide the validity of a so-called "special stipulation” in haec verba: "This contract is contingent an[d] subject to the purchaser being able to refinance the loan in the amount of $200,000 that is presently held by Cameron and Brown Mortgage Company.”

Smith as the proposed buyer sued Potts, the realtor, for return…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barto v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Cutcliffe v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Williams v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Cole v. CutlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Scott v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brack v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Farmer v. ArgentaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Koets, Inc. v. BenvenisteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Stone Mountain Realty, Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Bell v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API