Legal Opinion

Colwell v. Mullen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2018No. S-17-889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeavican, C.J.

*862 INTRODUCTION

Dr. Robert F. Colwell, Jr., D.D.S., and his self-named professional corporation (collectively Colwell), filed suit alleging malpractice against Sean Mullen and against Hancock & Dana, P.C. (collectively Mullen). Sean Mullen is an attorney licensed to practice law and works as a tax attorney at Hancock & Dana, an accounting firm. The district court granted Mullen's motion for summary judgment, concluding that Colwell's malpractice claims were barred by the statute of limitations set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 2016). We affirm.

**410 FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Dr. Colwell was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. HadleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jordan v. LSF8 Master Participation TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding Holdings (Ny), LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Zook v. ZookNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. Prospect Funding HoldingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Beckner v. UrbanNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Filsinger v. Jacobs (In Re Estate of Filsinger)Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API