Legal Opinion

State v. Leuhrsman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Benton District Gourt.- — -Hon. Obed Caswell, Judge. Indictment for assault with intent to inflict great bodily injury upon one Henry Pickart. The defendant was convicted, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J

ness: admission as to testimony: objection. The defendant having filed a motion for continuance because of the absence of a material witness, and the court having intimated that the showing was sufficient, counsel for the state announced that he would admit that the witness, if present, would . .. testify as stated m the affidavit, and thereupon the motion .was overruled and the trial proceeded. When counsel for defendant offered to read the matter stated in the affidavit as the testimony of the absent witness, the state objected to certain parts of said statement, but assigned no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Puth v. ZimblemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. State v. GeddisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. State v. SaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. State v. BeebeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. United States v. BalanceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1932
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. State v. HornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Jones v. KrambeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API