Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1925No. 16016PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

1. An accusation alleging that the accused “did unlawfully have, control and possess spirituous, vinous, malted and fermented liquors, and alcoholic compounds” sufficiently states the offense. Park’s Ann. Code, § 448 (b); Brown v. State, 8 Ga. App. 691 (1) (70 S. E. 40); Lewis v. State, 17 Ga. App. 445 (1) (87 S. E. 709); Harris v. State, 21 Ga. App. 796 (95 S. E. 321).

2. The further averment that such liquors were not pure alcohol to be used for medicinal, mechanical or scientific purposes, nor wine to be used for sacramental purposes, was mere surplusage. McAdams v. State, 9 Ga.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. McAdams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API