Legal Opinion

Yamane v. Pohlson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2006No. 27047PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

The present appeal concerns the issue whether plaintiffs-appellants John Yamane, as special administrator of the Estate of John Duong (John), Hung Duong, and Due Lai [hereinafter, collectively, the plaintiffs] have complied with Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) chapter 671, which established the Medical Claims Conciliation Panel [hereinafter, the MCCP or the panel] to “review and render findings and advisory opinions on the issues of liability and damages in medical tort [1] claims against health care providers[,]” HRS § 671-ll(a) (1993), prior to filing their…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Norris v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Menashe v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  3. Sykes v. Home Health Care Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  4. Ritchie v. WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITALDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2009
  5. State v. MinistriesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API