Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Gorman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 8, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

The appellees, and defendants below, Charles E. Gorman and Arthur Gorman, á partnership doing business under the name of Gorman Construction Company, were constructing a section of a state highway in Floyd County, Kentucky, in 1938, under a contract they had entered into with the State Highway Commission.

An essential material in the performance of their contract was crushed rock, which was transported from a quarry located within this Commonwealth to a nearby station called Eastern on appellant’s railroad traversing Floyd county. There was a depot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Avent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. New River Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kittanning Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. TerrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Riddle v. City of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API