Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance v. Paddock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1962No. 18891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge.

This is an equitable proceeding originally instituted by Travis B. Stanford, individually and doing business as Stanford Construction Company, and Stanford Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, seeking reformation of an insurance policy issued by appellant, Aetna Insurance Company, on the ground of mutual mistake. The District Court entered judgment on the verdict of an advisory jury in^favor of plaintiffs which judgment was reversed and remanded by this court, Aetna Insurance Company v. Stanford, 5 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 150, for the failure of the District…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Hurwitz v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Hargrove v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Majestic v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aetna Insurance Company v. PaddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API