Legal Opinion · Dissent
Fahey v. Canino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 2003Published
1DissentLahtinen, J.
I respectfully dissent. Concedediy, the lines of liability in this troublesome and emotionally compelling area of law are not delineated with acuity and have resulted in many divided decisions (see Tebbutt v Virostek, 65 NY2d 931 [1985] [three judge plurality, one judge concurring on constraint; two separately penned dissents]; see also Lynch v Bay Ridge Obstetrical & Gynecological Assoc., 72 NY2d 632 *1073[1988] [divided court]; Martinez v Long Is. Jewish Hillside Med. Ctr., 70 NY2d 697 [1987] [divided court]; Vaccaro v Squibb Corp., 52 NY2d 809 [1980] [divided court]). Under prevailing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lynch v. Bay Ridge Obstetrical & Gynecological AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Vaccaro v. Squibb Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Martinez v. Long Island Jewish Hillside Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ferrara v. BernsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Canty v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.