Legal Opinion

Camosy, Inc. v. River Steel, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 9, 1993No. 2-92-1445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Colwell

Plaintiff, Camosy, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a directed finding in favor of defendant, River Steel, Inc. Plaintiff, a general contractor, had filed a one-count complaint based upon promissory estoppel, alleging injury resulting from its reliance upon defendant’s bid proposal for a construction project. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in directing a finding in favor of defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case because plaintiff’s prima facie case under the doctrine of promissory estoppel was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kokinis v. KotrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Application of Kane County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. McHenry State Bank v. City of McHenryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Rasmussen v. LaMagdelaineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffrey M. Goldberg v. Collins TuttleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Pickus Construction & Equipment v. American Overhead DoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Straka v. FrancisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Pickus Construction & Equipment v. American Overhead DoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API