Camosy, Inc. v. River Steel, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Colwell
Plaintiff, Camosy, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the circuit court granting a directed finding in favor of defendant, River Steel, Inc. Plaintiff, a general contractor, had filed a one-count complaint based upon promissory estoppel, alleging injury resulting from its reliance upon defendant’s bid proposal for a construction project. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in directing a finding in favor of defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case because plaintiff’s prima facie case under the doctrine of promissory estoppel was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Kokinis v. KotrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Application of Kane County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- McHenry State Bank v. City of McHenryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Rasmussen v. LaMagdelaineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jeffrey M. Goldberg v. Collins TuttleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Pickus Construction & Equipment v. American Overhead DoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Straka v. FrancisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Pickus Construction & Equipment v. American Overhead DoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001